Sources
Every factual claim is backed by peer-reviewed research, a clinical guideline from a recognised medical body, or a regulator’s document. Each article lists its sources at the end. We prefer systematic reviews and randomised trials over single studies, and single studies over expert opinion. When the evidence is weak or contradictory, the article says so.
Review
Articles on health, medicines, bloodwork and recovery are reviewed by a licensed physician before publication. The reviewer’s name appears on the article. Training and nutrition articles are reviewed by the editor against the cited literature.
What we do not publish
We do not publish dosages, cycle lengths, stacks, injection instructions or post-cycle protocols. We describe what compounds and classes of compounds do and what risks they carry, so that readers can have an informed conversation with a physician. This is a deliberate editorial boundary, not an oversight.
Independence
The site sells nothing, carries no advertising, takes no sponsorship and uses no affiliate links. Nobody outside the editorial team sees an article before it is published.
Updates and corrections
Every article shows its publication date and, if changed, its last update date. When new evidence changes a conclusion, the article is revised and the change is noted. Errors reported by readers are corrected as quickly as possible; substantive corrections are noted in the article.
Use of AI tools
Drafting and translation may use AI tools. Every published sentence is checked by a human against the sources. AI does not add claims, sources or numbers on its own.